The Rising Cost of Operations

  1. Navy Fleet

  2. Air Force Fighter / Attack Force

  3. Army Active Maneuver Battalions

  4. O&M spending per active duty person

Return to Defense Charts and Data

1.  Since the end of World War II, the number of ships has fluctuated, but generally gone down (left scale).  Conversely, the operations & maintenance (O&M) budget has trended upwards (right scale), reflecting the increasing complexity of ship designs.  Note that although both inventory and O&M budgets have decreased since the height of the Reagan build-up in the late 1980s, the number of ships has declined faster than the operations and maintenance budget.  The net effect of these changes has been a marked increase in per unit O&M costs.

 

2.  The situation in the Air Force mirrors that of the Navy, with numbers (left scale) decreasing faster than O&M budgets (right scale).  Again, the root cause is the increase in complexity marking each new generation of fighter aircraft (with minor exceptions such as the A-10 failing to offset the main fighter progression: F-100 to F-4 to F-15).

3.  Finally, the Army presents the same pattern, with forces generally declining, while O&M budgets have actually trended upward over the time period shown.

4.  When aggregated DoD-wide, the trends noted above lead to an interesting conclusion:  since its bottom in the early 1960s, O&M spending compared to force size (as measured by number of active duty personnel) has more than tripled.  This is a direct result of a forty-year policy of structuring smaller and smaller forces consisting of ever more complex weapon systems.

Return to Defense Charts and Data