|
On War #49
How 2004 Looks From Potsdam
1/07/04
By William S. Lind
At the beginning of a new year, it is traditional
for columnists, commentators and other harmless drudges to take a look
at their crystal ball and forecast what the year may bring. Fortunately,
I have superior technology. My home telephone was made in 1918. When
I need to see down the road a bit, I just call the Kaiser (he is, after
all, my reporting senior). I got through to Potsdam a few nights ago,
and here is what der Allerhöchste
thinks may be in store for us in 2004:
-
In Iraq, the War of National Liberation led
by the Ba'ath will diminish as the Ba'ath itself fragments. This
may lead to a “pause” of sorts in the guerilla war, which the neo-cons
will falsely hail as a sign of American victory. In fact, the splintering
of the Ba'ath will move Iraq even farther away from being able to
recreate a real state. As the Ba'ath fades, true Fourth Generation
forces will rise, leading to more fighting among Iraqis and an eventual
multi-sided, permanent Iraqi civil war. Attacks on Americans will
rise again as various Fourth Generation entities seek to show that
they are the deadliest enemy of the Crusaders. 2004 will also see
the Shiites play a more active role. If Mr. Bremer tries to thwart
them by rigging elections (or just not having them), our troops
are likely to end up with their hands full of Shiite.
-
His Majesty foresees three other interesting
possibilities in Iraq. First, another long, hot summer with no security
and little electric power may generate an intifada on the
Palestinian model; the U.S. Army’s use of Israeli tactics increases
this possibility, because it leads Iraqis to visualize themselves
as Palestinians. Second, the morale of American troops in Iraq,
already low, may decline to the point where the U.S. Army starts
to crack, much as the German Army did in August, 1918. Third, when
the Marines go back into Iraq, they will use very different tactics
from the Army, tactics that might have worked had they been applied
earlier. But again like Germany in 1918, the situation will be too
far gone for any tactics to redeem it.
-
The war in Afghanistan will unroll like all
previous Afghan wars. The Taliban will slowly but steadily retake
the countryside, while we cling to Kabul and try to prop up our
puppet government. The only question is when we, like the British
and the Soviets, will recognize reality, give up and go home.
-
Far more important than either Iraq or Afghanistan
is Pakistan, where the state is crumbling. The year 2004 may well
be the year when it goes over the edge, handing the international
Islamic jihad 40-50 nuclear weapons. His Majesty said, “General
Musharraf is about where I was at the beginning of November, 1918.”
-
Throughout the Islamic world, al Qaeda and other
non-state forces will thrive and grow. Speaking of Libya’s recent
attempt at a rapprochement with the United States, His Majesty said,
“I had a good laugh when your neo-cons, who make my former advisors
look intelligent, claimed Qaddafi did this out of fear of the U.S.
What terrifies him and drives him toward other states, including
America, is fear of non-state elements inside Libya. This is just
one small example of the unholy alliances states will make with
other states, and non-state forces will make with other non-state
forces. At our last tabagie, my ancestors from the time of
the wars of religion in Europe were all nodding and saying that
it will soon be time for them to go back, because it will all be
so familiar.”
-
Look for non-Islamic Fourth Generation forces
to make their mark in the United States. America is now making war
on the FARC in Columbia, and it is likely to return the favor. “Remember,
they’ve got a better distribution system in the United States than
the Reichspost had in Germany.”
-
“Your government’s color-coded alert system
is almost as effective as my U-boat war was in undermining your
own strategy,” His Majesty volunteered. “The other side knows exactly
what intelligence indicators you look for, and it is playing you
like a glockenspiel. When it is not going to do anything big, it
feeds you false indicators to make you jump, undermining your own
people’s sense of security and making your enemy look stronger that
he is. Of course, when something real is coming, there will be no
indicators at all.”
I knew there was a Zapfenstreich in Heaven
that night, and I did not want to keep my Sovereign on the phone with
the petty concerns of earth. But I did follow up his last comment with
a final question: was “something real” likely to happen in 2004? His
Majesty sighed. “Look for something big, real big, right before your
election. Al Qaeda has an excellent sense of timing.”
“But wouldn’t that help reelect George Bush?” I
asked, puzzled.
“Ja, genau,” the Kaiser replied. “I guess
you haven’t spent enough time at court to really understand these things.
As Bismarck said to me just yesterday, al Qaeda and George Bush need
each other.”
If you would like to interview Mr. Lind, please
allow me to be of assistance.
Jill Sutherland Farrell
Email:
jfarrell@freecongress.org
Director of Communications
Free Congress Foundation
717 Second Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20002
Phone 202-204-5304
Fax 202-543-5605
Mobile 703-405-8905
The Free Congress Foundation is a 26-year-old Washington,
DC-based conservative think tank, that teaches people how to be effective
in the political process, advocates judicial reform, promotes cultural
conservatism, and works against the government encroachment of individual
liberties.
|